How ‘Intuition’ Exploded∗

Recent decades have seen a surge in interest in metaphilosophy. In particular there has been an interest in philosophical methodology. Various questions have been asked about philosophical methods. Are our methods any good? Can we improve upon them? However, prior to such evaluative and ameliorative concerns, is the matter of what methods philosophers actually use. Worryingly, our understanding of philosophical methodology is impoverished in various respects. I consider one particular respect in which we seem to be missing an important part of the picture. While it is a received wisdom that the word ‘intuition’ has exploded across analytic philosophy in recent decades, I present evidence that the explosion is apparent across a broad swathe of academia (and perhaps beyond). I note various implications for current methodological debates about the role of intuitions in philosophy.